Review | Iron Man 3

Iron Man 3

Directed by Shane Black

The third film in the Iron Man series is set shortly after the events which occurred in Avengers, but Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) is not celebrating any victories. Inwardly he is struggling to come to terms with these recent events (simply referred to as New York) Iron Man 3 Teaser Posterand suffers anxiety attacks due to post-traumatic stress. He has withdrawn himself to a certain degree, spending most of his time tinkering in his workshop while Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) is left to run Stark Industries, and Colonel James Rhodes (Don Cheadle) rules the skies in his War Machine suit, now re-branded as the Iron Patriot. As a result of all his spare time, Stark has made some impressive changes to the Iron Man suits, which are at times funny, but also very cool.

While Iron Man has been in semi-retirement, a new evil has risen in the form of The Mandarin (Ben Kingsley), who indiscriminately slaughters men, women and children, with the help of his new breed of super soldier, and defies all, claiming that the United States is getting what is coming to it. In a confrontation with the media, Tony Stark impulsively dares the Mandarin to bring the fight to him, which he promptly does, destroying Stark’s entire house with Tony and Pepper barely managing to escape. Stark goes AWOL trying to figure out the mystery of The Mandarin and has to do so without the help of his Iron Man suit. He proves that he is not just a hero because of his armored suit, but he is quite the formidable foe with even the most basic of tools. We get to see Iron Man in his simplest, most basic form. No glamour, no computers, just the genius that is Tony Stark. Then when the going gets rough we also get to see what he can do with his entire workshop. Tony Stark is not perfect and his weaknesses are laid bare in this story but he proves that he is still a hero even when everything has been taken away from him.

The first movie to be released as part of Marvel’s Phase 2, Iron Man 3 had a lot to live up to. Especially being the first Marvel movie to come out since Avengers. How do you create a bigger battle than the one that earth’s mightiest heroes had to face?  Well, Iron Man 3 wasn’t out to try and go bigger or more impressive, yet I was more impressed. The story was deeper and the villains seemed more villainous. Iron Man had to face this threat on his own. There was no S.H.I.E.L.D. or Avengers team to back him up this time. One has to assume they were busy dealing with their own problems. As always, Robert Downey Jr. is the perfect fit for Tony Stark. Anyone can put on an Iron Man suit but in my eyes only Downey Jr. could be Stark. Gwyneth Paltrow had more than one moment to shine this time as Pepper got her chance to be the hero. I could feel the emotion shown in her face at the times when she showed her care for Tony. Without giving away too much of the plot I will say that Ben Kingsley was great as The Mandarin but I was disappointed with how his role played out, through no fault of his own. His acting was impeccable. Guy Peirce was also a very cool calculating bad guy as Aldrich Killian. These Marvel movies never fail to keep a sense of humor through it all and Iron Man is always great with his deadpan wit.

Written by Ben Freeman

About these ads

Cloud Atlas – Top Wachowski Films

CLOUD ATLAS

TOP WACHOWSKI FILMS

The siblingdirectorial pairing of Lana and Andy Wachowski teamed up with Tom Tykwer to create the powerful and inspiring epic Cloud Atlas, based on the best-selling novel by David Mitchell.To celebrate the film’s release on 22 Februarywe are going to take a look at the Wachowski’s best work to date, including The Matrix and V for Vendetta.

THE MATRIX

In 1999 the Wachowski’s brought us the ground-breaking and genre-defining Sci-fi film,The Matrix, starring Keanu Reeves, Laurence Fishburne and Hugo Weaving. The film blew audiences away with its ground-breaking introduction of a visual effect now known as ‘bullet time’, which allows a shot to progress in slow-motion while the camera appears to move through the scene at normal speed. The Wachowski’s both wrote and directed this visual masterpiece which grossed over $450 million at the worldwide box-office. The film spawned two sequels, The Matrix Reloaded and The Matrix Revolutions, bringing in a whopping $1.6 billion total box-office for the franchise.

THE MATRIX RELOADED

The Wachowski’s returned in May 2003 to bring audiencesThe Matrix Reloaded, the second instalment in The Matrix trilogy. In the second film Neo and the rebel leaders learn that they have only 72 hours before Zion is destroyed by 250,000 sentinel machines. Neo must try to save Zion while also saving Trinity from the dark fate which plagues his dreams. This second instalment in the franchisegrossed a box-office of over $740 million worldwide.

THE MATRIX REVOLUTIONS

The Matrix trilogy ended in November 2003 with the release of The Matrix Revolutions. The final film in the trilogy follows Neo as he fights to end the war between the machines and humans. Neo must finally defeat the rogue Agent Smith while the human city of Zion defends itself against invasion by the machines. The Matrix Revolutions made over $425 million at the box-office worldwide and provided audiences with an explosive ending to the franchise, packed with ground-breaking CGI and an epic one-on-one battle between Neo and Agent Smith.

V FOR VENDETTA

The Wachowski’s wrote the 2006 thriller V for Vendetta, based on the comic book of the same name by Alan Moore and David Lloyd and starring Hugo Weaving, John Hurt and Natalie Portmanand was directed by James McTeigue. The film followed a shadowy freedom-fighter known only as ‘V’ who uses terrorist tactics to bring down the totalitarian society in which he lives. Caught in between the government and ‘V’ is Evey (Portman), who must decide whose side she is on before the explosive finale.

CLOUD ATLAS

The Wachowski’s latest release is the epic Cloud Atlas, based on the best-selling novel by David Mitchell and stars an award-winning cast including: Tom Hanks, Jim Broadbent, Ben Wishaw, Jim Sturgess, Hugh Grant, David Gyasi and Susan Surrandon. This powerful film is full of drama, mystery, action and enduring love, thread through a single story that unfolds in multiple timelines over the span of 500 years.  Characters meet and reunite from one life to the next. As the consequences of their actions and choices impact one another through the past, the present and the distant future, one soul is shaped from a killer into a hero, and a single act of kindness ripples across centuries to inspire a revolution.

Cloud Atlas is in cinemas this Friday 22nd February.

Big Indie Film Sale! Get a Bargain AND Help the Indie Scene! Win Win!

I received an email this morning from our friends over at Spirit Level Film. Instead of me interpreting it for you I figured  hey, why not let you read it for yourself! So here you go!

First off is a 50% discount on all films for just 3 days (ends Sunday night) for all our customers and a very big thank you for supporting us in 2012. Simply use coupon code SLF50 at the checkout. It’s applicable across the board – even the films on special offer already.

Secondly, at last we’ve come to a place where we’re comfortable with our admittedly eclectic mix of motoring, art and politics. Combining this with the great access we have to behind-the-scenes operators who move the worlds of these uneasy bedfellows has resulted in a decision to feature many of the unreported conversations and interviews we have with them on our blog. We’ve no idea how they’ll sit side by side but at least it’ll give you an all too rare and first-hand insight from source before you get to hear about it in the news.

First up is politics, with a seriously tough, secret negotiator, next is an exclusive with one of the great petrolhead film directors.

We’ll also be launching our sneak preview section – where you can watch extended previews from all our films. Bear with us on this one, it’s under development and got a few days more work – we’ll keep you posted.

In the meantime – here’s wishing you a happy, healthy year to come with everything you could wish for yourselves.

Spirit Level Film is a fantastic website aimed at the distribution of both indie news and products! These websites are all too rare these days so get on over there and see for yourself. Pick up some amazing bargains and see some truly brilliant and inspirational films from the wonderful world of independent cinema! http://www.spiritlevelfilm.com/

Here is a trailer to a documentary series WatchReadReview have worked with and is just one of the many films available:  

Long Live Indie!

Introducing: Predator One

Introducing: Predator One

What if our nation’s enemies finally got smart? What if, instead of spending billions on religious fanatics, they hired a team of battle-hardened mercenaries to do their dirty work, and maintained for themselves a deniable position from the comforts of their own homelands?

This question, posed by film-maker Chris Ross Leong, jump-starts the plot of his contemporary warfare film, Predator One. The film explores the latest technology available to modern military forces and, specifically, the increasing use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs).

A new technology demands a new skill set, and Predator One reveals that warfare is becoming less about soldiers risking their lives for their country, and more like a highly-advanced video game. It’s a technology that allows military personnel to sit back, hundreds of miles from the frontline, and operate UAV’s via a screen and a ‘game’ controller.

Being able to identify and destroy the enemy remotely, with no danger to the operator, seems to be the perfect military solution. That is until your very own technology is used against you.

Predator One sees a sharp but ageing U.S. Air Force pilot and his sensor Operator completing their final work shift at a remote base. They hand over the last of America’s first generation UAVs, Predator One, to their replacements — a team of irreverent, game-playing youngsters. America’s new generation of ‘Remote Tech’ soldiers come with third generation long-range stealth combat drones. These guys are out to ‘squash the bugs’ that are today’s enemies.

But soon after hand-over, the base is assaulted by an unidentified combat unit. The newly-arrived team of Tech soldiers, with only basic training under their belts, don’t stand a chance against battle-hardened veterans. The advanced weapons are seized, and turned against the United States.

A band of U.S. combat veterans, previously posted on the base, have escaped the carnage. Together with the newly-retired USAF pilot and his sensor Op, they must combine traditional tactics with their superior technological knowledge in a desperate last-ditch attempt to stop the enemy. They must fight the old fashioned way; on the ground, up close, and very personal.

In Predator One, Chris addresses the central issue of how technology distances soldiers from the battle and how that has a significant negative impact.

On the ground, troops are able to judge a situation, and make decisions based on immediate information.

But a soldier sitting in front of a video screen with a controller in his hand has a completely different perspective.

How are strategic decisions now made? Can a situation be fully understood and correctly assessed? Do conscience, morality and the rules of engagement shift when a Tech solider confronts a ‘bad guy’ on screen? Is traditional warfare itself a relic of the past, or will it always be with us?

These are just some of the questions Chris Leong asks in Predator One.

This exciting project is still in its early stages but here at WatchReadReview I will be following step by step and keeping you updated. Watch this space people.

Written by Oliver Willis

Act of Valor (2012)

Act of Valor sees a team of Navy SEALs embark on a mission to find and rescue a CIA agent being held captive. That is the plot summed up in under 25 words, but the basic plot is not the real story here, its the soldiers themselves.

Normally, when watching a war film, you will be expecting to see the usual American epic about some American soldiers who overcame overwhelming odds in order to preserve their way of life. This is where Act of Valor differs from the norm.

The main aspect of this film which I most enjoyed was the real life tactics which were used. Instead of seeing some soldier doing a James Bond run, where he runs in front of numerous guns and never seems to get shot, we see real tactics being used. Some of the manoeuvres they manage is actually shocking and the way they can infiltrate an enemy’s position with such stealth is quite frankly a little scary.

The reason the tactics and action scenes in this film appear so authentic and accurate is because the main cast is composed of active duty soldiers. These men have performed these manoeuvres time and time again and when they do it on camera it looks no different to when they do it in real life, except the actor lives.

The only slight drawback to this film, in my opinion, would be the acting of the main cast. I understand that the main cast are soldiers and not actors but that really does become apparent right from the beginning. But as the film progresses so does the action. These soldiers are then portraying their lives on camera and gradually becoming more comfortable to watch, mainly because the acting is minimal for them during the middle and end of the film as they are in combat. But as I said this is the only small negative I would point out in an otherwise positive experience.

The cast and crew were obviously going for the authentic and realistic approach, and my god did they succeed. Not only did they use active duty soldiers to bring realism to the tactics and dialogue but they even used live ammunition for a lot of the gun fights and explosions. You can identify this almost immediately, the gun shots and explosions not only look fantastic but they even sound completely different. I noticed the camera angels also contributed to this effect. They used a lot of first person camera shots, looking through the eyes of the soldier, seeing what they are seeing. I think this worked wonderfully, especially in the night scenes where the soldiers were using night vision goggles.

So overall I really enjoyed this film. The action scenes were fantastic, the tactics were chilling even if the acting was a little off. The last point I would like to address is the use of not only the active duty soldiers, which I have mentioned, but the exclusion of big actors. Using unknown actors was an excellent choice, especially as they were going for the authentic, real approach and from my experience one of the many things which can snap the audience out of the moment and remind them that this is fake is George Clooney or Brad Pitt showing his face on screen with an army hat on. Not cool.

So if you like war films, if you like blood pumping combat then you will love Act of Valor. And for you women reading this thinking, “great, another 90 minute testosterone filled war film” think again. You get to see these soldiers for who they are, not just killers, not just someone doing their job but husbands and fathers, you see how their families cope, you see the real life and thoughts of today’s modern soldier.

Written by Oliver Willis

Haywire

Haywire (2011)

I would normally open a review with giving a brief and simple overview of the film but for the life of me, Haywire does not make that so simple. In short it is about a black-ops agent who gets betrayed by her employers and then seeks to exact revenge.

That is a simplified version of what the film is about, but honestly, i was unsure who was betraying who for most of the film. Even when it finished i was left wondering what on earth just happened. I am normally good at following complicated plot lines, but this was not so much complicated, as just messy.

So the needless complication of the plot was probably my only negative i am going to give this film, most of it was rather impressive and refreshing. The cinematography was an aspect of this film which i found most impressive. The camera angles were unusual, not the same straight shots etc that you’re used to seeing in your average action film. It didn’t do the quick shots which are common place in fighting scenes to give the impression of the fight be faster than it is.

Instead a lot of the action shots were still, allowing the viewer to see everything that is going on. As the lead actress, Gina Carnao, in an excellent martial artist it was quite something to behold as she took down villain after villain.

The fighting itself was probably the most realistic i have seen in a very long time. No moves added in for show, no useless back flips, just hardcore action the way it would go down in real life you’d believe.

Another point i would like to draw attention to is the use of sound. A lot of the film was done without too much dialogue. The action scenes were just that, action, they didn’t talk to each other, didn’t taunt each other, just both concentrating on not being the one to die. This again added to that sense of realism. How many times have we seen the bad guy taunting the good guy when on the brink of victory, only to have the good guy cut him off mid sentence with the usual epic come-back. Well not this time, you talk you die it would seem.

I believe the cast was another interesting point. They were an odd assortment of actors, not usually seen together. We are talking about actors such as Michael Douglas, Antonio Banderas, Ewan McGregor, Michael Fassbender and Channing Tatum. Now these are some big names in Hollywood, but i felt they were, mostly, unneeded. The parts did not seem to call for them to play and i didn’t see their inclusion in the film as something i could not picture a less well known actor doing. The exception to that would be Michael Fassbender and maybe Channing Tatum. Their roles seemed to fit them, i couldn’t picture anyone else as their characters, but with everyone else, i could.

Don’t get me wrong, the film was good, had some rather refreshing takes on the action film scene. The only thing that seemed to kill it for me was the needlessly over-complicated plot. It could have been done to the same effect, or even better, by making it simpler, maybe i would have had a better response to it, but who knows. The bottom line is, Haywire is a good film, i would recommend you watch it if you’re into your martial arts, but its definitely not something to write home about.

Written by Oliver Willis

Safe

Safe (2012)

Is it just me, or are these Jason Statham action films becoming harder and harder to tell apart? They say to go with what you know, but blast it all, I need to know if this man is capable of something other than fight choreography and witty one-liners. Safe is yet another film that exploits his physicality and completely ignores his potential for actual acting. On the basis of just about every movie he has ever been in, filmmakers don’t regard him as an artist but merely as a tool – the go-to guy for mindless stunts and relentless action violence. Is this because real acting isn’t his forte? If that’s the case, fine, but please have the decency to let me know this. Cast him in a role he’s unqualified for and let me watch him fail. At least then I can finally stop questioning the extent of his range.

Unfortunately, Statham’s typecasting is only part of what makes this movie so bad. Safe weaves a needlessly convoluted tale of crime and corruption, which is to say that audiences seeking the kind of cheap thrills Statham is known for are unlikely to make heads or tails of who’s doing what to whom and why. When we’re not trying to muddle our way through the plot, we must endure scene after scene of gun-pointing and shooting and brutal hand-to-hand combat, most of which are over so quickly and edited with such rapid-fire pacing that it’s virtually impossible to distinguish one move from another. At which point did cinematic action fall victim to such mobility extremes? If it isn’t in agonizing slow motion, then it’s cut together like a frenetic music video. Middle ground seems to have disappeared somewhere along the way.

The plot, as it were, involves a former NYPD cop named Luke Wright (Statham), who was at one time involved in a task force specializing in the assassination of terrorists. Ashamed of his actions, he took to being a cage fighter in New Jersey. During one of the matches, he didn’t take the dive he was supposed to take and ended up putting his opponent in a coma. He also got himself in hot water with Russian mobsters, who punished him by murdering his wife. Rather than kill him as well, they decree that he must live the rest of his days as an outcast of society; anyone he comes into contact with will immediately be killed. He spends the next year living as a vagrant in New York City, acting coldly to anyone that speaks to him. In a moment of weakness, he gave a homeless man his shoes. Any guesses as to what happened next?

As this is being established, and I should point out that the opening scenes are played out of sequence, we meet a twelve-year-old Chinese girl named Mei (Catherine Chan), whose savant-like math skills catch the attention of a ruthless mobster named Han Jiao (James Hong). He has his henchmen kidnap her and, under threat of murdering her gravely ill mother (conveniently unseen), transport her to New York, where she will keep track of all the illegal rackets going on in Chinatown. She’s eventually given an unbelievably long number written on a piece of paper and instructed to memorize it. She does so instantaneously. She was to have been given a second number, but Russian mobsters intervened – which is to say, they crashed their vehicles into those of the Chinese henchmen, shot most of them, and kidnapped Mei. It isn’t long before she escapes and crosses paths with Luke, who was about ready to commit suicide by jumping onto subway rails.

The confusion over the connection between the Russians and the Chinese is maddening. It only gets worse when it’s revealed that both are tied to a group of corrupt cops, all of whom have a serious grudge against Luke. They waste no time in showing it; he’s arrested and driven to a quiet area of the city, at which point they all take their turns beating the living hell out of him. But let’s get back to Luke and Mei crossing paths. For reasons not made apparent to the audience, Luke’s paternal instincts kick in, and he vows to keep her safe. Mei, who speaks fluent English without a trace of an accent, tells him about the numbers she had to memorize. He deduces that hidden within the numbers is a code. It’s around this time that yet another sub-plot is added to the mix, this one involving the Mayor (Chris Sarandon). There’s also more fighting and a lot of Luke taking control through lies and manipulation.

Putting aside the plot altogether, there’s absolutely nothing about the relationship between Luke and Mei that comes off as genuine. One essentially acts as a deus ex machina for the other, their situations contrived solely for the purpose of having the two paired together. It doesn’t help that Statham and Chan have no chemistry; never once do their characters exhibit anything resembling a pseudo father-daughter bond, or even basic friendship. Is this the sign that I was looking for, the one that would let me know that Statham is indeed a bad actor and only good for brutal stunt work? Or is it merely a matter of bad writing and directing? I honestly don’t know. I can’t even tell if Safe was intended to be taken seriously, given the awkward mix of cringe-inducing violence and flippant dialogue. This movie is a gigantic mess.

Written by Chris Pandolfi

Red ails large

Red Tails (2012)

Red Tails is caught in a fatal tug-of-war between two narrative approaches. On one side, we have serious drama; the film is an historical account of the Tuskegee Airmen, the first ever group of African American fighter pilots to serve the United States military during World War II. On the other side, we have a stylistic homage; it’s a generic war movie rife with threadbare clichés, some lightweight, some melodramatic, all of it dated and hopelessly predictable. Perhaps if someone had come to a decision as to which film they wanted to make, there might have been something to get out of it. Had I been executive producer George Lucas, who invested an estimated $100 million of his own money into its budget and promotion, I would have opted for a more serious approach.

That’s because the real life story of the Airmen is far more compelling than the film-makers give it credit for. During World War II, many African Americans were still subject to degrading Jim Crow laws, and the U.S. military was racially segregated. It took just over twenty years of civil rights advocacy for Congress to pass a law amending the rules that prevented funding for the training of black military pilots. That was in 1939, two years before the formation of the Tuskegee program and five years before the all-black 332nd Fighter Group would be sent overseas to join the 99th Squadron in escorting the Fifteenth Air Force’s bombing raids across Europe. Even then, the War Department stipulated that blacks be put into separate military units and that they be staffed by white officers, who usually prevented them from advancing.

Not much of this background information is explored in Red Tails. It takes place in 1944, after the program had been established. This provides precious little context for audiences unfamiliar with the history of the Airmen. What the film-makers do explore has been filtered through a highly conventional lens, many scenes looking, sounding, and advancing as if they had been lifted straight from a 1950s war movie. At that time, Hollywood would freely indulge in contrivances and stereotypical characters, including the unyielding superior officers, the hotshot young privates, and the poor sons of bitches that would die after revealing their plans to return home to their women. This movie provides us with variations of all of the above. The dialogue, especially during the early combat scenes, was written in the cornball style of a Saturday matinee serial – a mixture of obvious puns, harmless goading, and preachy sermons.

When the issue of racism finally does work its way into the plot, it will immediately be obvious how much it has been simplified and sanitized. Bryan Cranston, for example, plays Col. William Mortamus, an inflexible white bigot who, naturally, speaks in a Southern drawl. He will on a few occasions butt heads with A.J. Bullard (Terrence Howard), a black colonel who correctly points out that his men deserve better than rusty hand-me-down planes. He delivers every line as if giving a child an ultimatum. And then there are the scenes with the Airmen stationed in Italy. The white pilots refuse to give them the time of day until the Airmen do their stuff during the bombing raids; at that point, the white men make the most miraculous and sudden of turnarounds, going so far as to salute the Airmen in broad daylight, inviting them for a round of drinks at the local bar (which they had previously been denied access to), and even shake their hands. If problems were this easy to solve, the world would indeed be a much better place.

Several characters are given their own dramatic situations. There’s friction between best friends Martin “Easy” Julian (Nate Parker) and Joe “Lightning” Little (David Oyelowo). The former likes to do everything according to protocol and masks his resentment of his unseen but nonetheless demanding father with alcohol. The latter is an ace pilot who takes foolish risks, on land and in the air. There’s the kid everyone calls Junior, although he would much prefer the nickname Ray Gun (Tristan Wilds); a bit inexperienced, he will eventually find himself in a POW camp and participating in a great escape with the white inmates. There’s Major Emanuel Stance (Cuba Gooding, Jr.), always with a pipe in his mouth, always having an occasion to deliver a firm but inspirational speech. The film-makers even find time for a soppy romance between Lightning and an Italian woman named Sofia (Daniela Ruah), the circumstances of which would be phony even within the pages of a dime store romance novel. Never mind the fact that they can express their love without knowing the languages they each speak.

For George Lucas, Red Tails was an odyssey, originally conceived of in 1988 but repeatedly postponed due to multiple script rewrites, many attached directors, and its rejection by every major studio because of it’s all-black cast, which they claimed would have made it impossible to market oversees. It’s a project he obviously cared about from the start. And yet … this is the best he could give us? I can give him credit for his trademark display of special effects; the aerial dogfight sequences, some edited in the style of a Star Wars space battle, are nothing short of spectacular. But all the digital wizardry in the world can’t compensate for a screenplay that relies on an inferior plot and one-dimensional characters. How tragic that a very real and very interesting chapter in American history has been marginalized by bad film-making.

Written by Chris Pandolfi

Avengers Assemble

Avengers Assemble (2012)

Marvel’s The Avengers is the eagerly awaited convergence of the Marvel Studios superhero films, starting in 2008 with Iron Man and ending last summer with Captain America: The First Avenger. While it may not be appreciated or understood by those who have not seen the earlier films, and although it relies more on spectacle and less on plot, it’s nevertheless a fun and exciting action extravaganza – a comic book film in every sense. Having recently co-written and produced the highly overrated horror spoof The Cabin in the Woods, writer/director Joss Whedon delivers an entertaining escapist fantasy that’s just as funny as it is pulse-pounding. He also gives us plenty of eye candy, only some of which is enhanced by the film’s presentation in post-conversion 3D.

I have no baggage attached to the various characters or the comic books from which they came, so any potential observations or complaints that this movie is not faithful to its source material will fall on deaf ears. All I can respond to are the stories as they appeared on the big screen. Despite various writers, directors, and stylistic approaches, I’ve been pleased with the results. Even Thor, generally the least liked of the intertwined series, had just enough to earn my seal of approval. The standard was set with Iron Man, which remains the best of the Marvel series and still ranks as one of the greatest superhero films ever made. I think I was right in not expecting The Avengers to top it; it allowed me to enjoy the film for what it is and not for what it should be.

The plot revolves around the teaming of Tony Stark/Iron Man (Robert Downey, Jr.), a recently unfrozen Steve Rogers/Captain America (Chris Evans), Dr. Bruce Banner/The Incredible Hulk (Mark Ruffalo, the third actor to assume the role in the last ten years), the thunder god Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Natasha Romanoff/Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson), and the skilled archer Clint Barton/Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner) under the supervision of Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson), the director of a covert government organization known as S.H.I.E.L.D. Essentially, the must save the world from Thor’s evil adoptive brother Loki (Tom Hiddleston), who plots to subjugate humanity by opening a wormhole and unleashing ruthless alien warriors. To achieve this goal, he must recapture a glowing blue cube known as the Tesseract, a powerful but potentially deadly energy source.

The rest is pretty much just window dressing. We have plenty comic book peril and violence; there’s hand-to-hand combat and laser blasts, exploding air freighters and smashing Hulks, hammering Thors and the devastation of Manhattan, which is essentially the go-to city for glorious destruction. We have floating monstrosities that look like giant eels clad in armour. We have numerous references to the previous Marvel films, including appearances by Gwyneth Paltrow, Clark Gregg, and Stellan Skarsgård (alas, Natalie Portman makes it in only as a portrait on a computer screen). We have mutual distrust amongst the Avengers and Fury’s hidden agenda. We have Loki acting like an arrogant dictator, forcing a large crowd of people to kneel before him. And yes, we even have a cameo appearance by Stan Lee.

Whedon has never been a master of dialogue, although his flippant style is perfectly suited for the Tony Stark character, who has always possessed a biting wit and a natural superiority complex. The rest of the characters sound a bit goofy, although I guess that was the intention. Consider Gregg’s character, Agent Phil Coulson; when he finally meets Steve Rogers in person, he drops his aloof mystique and becomes an excited fan-boy eager to have his collection of Captain America trading cards autographed. This movie proves that visuals have always been Whedon’s strong suit. In the case of The Avengers, he uses them to evoke not only excitement but also a sense of humour; some of the funniest sight gags are reserved for the Incredible Hulk, who truly is only good for smashing things.

Movies like Marvel’s The Avengers are a unique marketing opportunity – a franchise assembled from other franchises that will itself inevitably spawn a new franchise. This is not a criticism, merely an observation. As long as I’m being entertained, it doesn’t matter to me how much a product is packaged, even if it comes within an inch of its life. I was very much entertained. Having said that, I can’t help but wonder how much mileage this series has left. Can five separate films and one convergence adequately serve as the basis for an Avengers sequel? Will the original five inspire any sequels of their own? Story wise, I find myself growing wary. The last thing I want is for all the fun to stop. One of the quickest ways to make that happen is to allow franchises to overstay their welcome.

Written by Chris Pandolfi

Seeking Justice

Seeking Justice (2011)

After a brief prologue sequence that will factor into the story much later, Seeking Justice opens with an example of two happy people living good lives in New Orleans. Will Gerard (Nicolas Cage) is a high school English teacher. Although it’s the type of school in which the students must pass through a metal detector before attending class, he seems capable of handling it. His wife, Laura (January Jones), is a successful cellist for an orchestra. The two are indisputably in love. Will is good friends with the school principal, Jimmy (Harold Perrineau), and the two regularly convene at a local chess club. It’s not a glamorous life, but it’s fulfilling. When things go this well for characters at the beginning of a film, Murphy’s Law inevitably rears its ugly head, and it can only go downhill from there.

And so it does. One night, quite unexpectedly, Laura is approached at gunpoint. Although we don’t actually see it, we learn later, as she lies in a hospital bed, that she was beaten and raped by an unknown man in snakeskin boots. Will is understandably devastated and furious. As he worriedly sit in the waiting room, a mysterious man approaches him like a heaven-sent deus ex machina. He says his name is Simon (Guy Pearce). He has heard about Laura’s unfortunate situation, and he would like to help. He’s not affiliated with the police. Despite this, he and his organization are very much interested in bringing justice to the city’s worst offenders, like the man who raped Laura. They could take care of him. It would be much quicker and less emotionally trying than if they relied on the legitimate justice system. It would not cost Will anything financially, although he may be called upon for a favour at some point. Will initially refuses, but quickly changes his mind.

And so six months pass. Will is back teaching. Laura is recovering, although she has resorted to getting a gun, and she has become a stickler for keeping the front door of their apartment locked at all times. Things seem to be back to normal. But then Simon pays Will a visit, and the situation becomes complicated and dangerous. As part of the agreement Will made at the hospital, he’s to track down a man Simon claims to be a paedophile. At the opportune time, Will must find a way to kill him off. That’s how Simon’s system works: They do you a favour for a crime committed against you, and you reciprocate by eliminating one dreg of human society at their behest. This is more than Will bargained for. He wants no part of it. But this is not something you can easily back out of. When Simon says … well, you know how it goes.

Seeking Justice is a technically competent action thriller, although when it comes to plot, characterization, and theme, it lacks the spark of imagination that would have allowed it to rise about the rest. Had it tried just a little harder, its increasingly preposterous twists and turns would be far less noticeable. By the final forty minutes or so, Will has transformed himself from a paranoid wreck to an intrepid detective, whose mission is multifaceted: (1) Find out Simon’s true identity; (2) determine how deeply rooted his band of vigilantes are in positions of authority, including press and law enforcement; (3) dig into local records for information gathered by a half-crazed investigative journalist; (4) clear his name after a turn of events I won’t reveal. It all seems rather convenient, outlandish, and rather conventional.

Having said that, there are moments that are genuinely exciting, and its handful of action sequences are visually engaging without going over the top. And I have no complaints in the performance department. This is good for Cage, especially after a disastrous turn in his previous film, the God-awful Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance. Here, he washes off the stink of forced camp and allows himself to actually act. Pearce plays a certifiable lunatic without having to ham it up, which would have been fatal for this material. Jones is not given all that much to do, although she’s convincing nonetheless; director Roger Donaldson even gives her a coveted moment in the climactic final sequence, which makes her more important to the story that it might first appear.

In spite of Pearce’s decent performance, I couldn’t help but be somewhat disappointed by his character’s rationale, which he explains to Will – or, more accurately, to the audience – at just the right moment. Apart from not being very original, it’s also a bit overwrought given the kind of movie this is. You’d expect such a simple, heavy handed explanation from a James Bond villain. This character is also pivotal to a plot twist that’s visible from a mile away; if you can’t see it coming, you’re probably better off, because it means you haven’t seen as many action thrillers as I have. Does any of this make Seeking Justice not worth the time and money on your part? Not necessarily. It may not have all the necessary ingredients, but there’s just enough to make it palatable.

Written by Chris Pandolfi